The Trump administration claims a ”victory” in this decision, but it seems odd to me.
The case was thrown out because the State of Maryland and District of Columbia have “no standing” to sue the President for violating the Constitution. I am not sure who does have “standing” to do that?
The idea of “no standing” as I understand it, means that the state or district isn’t being harmed by the President violating the Constitution. But who is? I mean this means that the President violates the Constitution and as long as no one is “hurt” it’s okay.
Why doesn’t that work with speeding? Why doesn’t that work for drug violations? Why doesn’t that work for regular people, why only the President?
Whereas it is essential to just government we recognise the equality of all people before the law. - US Civil Rights Act of 1875
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
This duet with Rosanne Cash and Keb' Mo' came out 5 years ago.
This duet with Keb' Mo' , featuring Rosanne Cash, came out five years ago and rings truer than ever today.
-
Roger Federer is a beautiful tennis player in so many ways. He was one that I was lucky to see play live quite often. Watching on television...
-
There is an interesting article in the New York Times today about counting deaths from Coronavirus. Here is the link . What they have tried ...
I haven't read the Complaint or the Ruling but it may be that the court believes plaintiffs cannot show they do or will suffer economic loss as a result of the hotel's business.
ReplyDelete