I always find these types of articles a bit silly.
Now don't get me wrong, I think the sentiment behind it is great. But, really, what is the point? The author explains (rather well) the WHY behind the electoral college. She also does a could job of explaining why it will never change (but she does that quite late in the piece).
Complaining about the electoral college is personally fulfilling and sociologically useless. It would need a Constitutional Amendment to pass. Even if you could get a 2/3s passage in the house, there is no way 3/4s of the states would choose to dilute their citizen's votes for equity (only 3 or 4 states would gain in this, California, New York and Florida).
Articles like this should be reserved for a couple of high under-grads arguing into the wee hours on how life would be better if they were in charge.
Whereas it is essential to just government we recognise the equality of all people before the law. - US Civil Rights Act of 1875
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
This duet with Rosanne Cash and Keb' Mo' came out 5 years ago.
This duet with Keb' Mo' , featuring Rosanne Cash, came out five years ago and rings truer than ever today.
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/FciQeRGYFlw/hqdefault.jpg)
-
Roger Federer is a beautiful tennis player in so many ways. He was one that I was lucky to see play live quite often. Watching on television...
-
There is an interesting article in the New York Times today about counting deaths from Coronavirus. Here is the link . What they have tried ...
No comments:
Post a Comment